- Home
- How We Score
Where the BestBoosting Method Stops Short
Every rating on this site begins with a receipt. I buy the job at the listed price, sit through it, and write down what happened at each step - 232 paid orders so far, none of them arranged with the shop in advance. The whole board gets re-checked on a monthly cycle, and the most recent pass closed July 2, 2026. Nobody buys a number here, and no service sees its score before you do.
The Scoring Formula
Five weighted inputs produce each Trust Score, which lands somewhere on a 0 to 100 scale, and every shop in the table meets those same weights. Safety and account handling carries 35% because a quick finish counts for nothing if the account it lands in gets flagged three weeks later. Delivery follows at 25%, then pricing, feedback and support. The weights were set once for the whole site and they stay put, so a shop cannot climb by shouting in one column and going quiet in the other four.
| Input | Share of score | What we measure |
|---|---|---|
| Safety & account handling | 35% | Does the player stay hidden while he works - appear-offline, no friend-list chatter, no chat popping up mid-match? Does the connection sit in the buyer's own country instead of two borders away? Where do the login details live, who else can see them, and what gets wiped at the end? I also mark down any shop that talks about ToS exposure as if it were zero, and I look at the account hygiene it asks a customer to do after delivery. |
| Delivery reliability and speed | 25% | Did the job I paid for actually finish, and did it land when the shop said it would? I timestamp the purchase, the first human reply, the first match played and the final screenshot. Stalls, silent handovers to a second player and mid-job agent swaps all cost points here, and so does a finish that does not match the tier on the invoice. |
| Transparent pricing | 15% | The figure on the payment page has to equal the figure I was quoted one click earlier. I sweep prices across a cheap job, a mid-size job and a long one, watch for currency rounding, processing charges and express upgrades pre-ticked by default, and I want the refund conditions written down somewhere a buyer can find them without opening a ticket. |
| Verified customer feedback | 15% | Reviews tied to a purchase anyone can verify carry weight. Twelve six-word raves posted the same afternoon do not. I read the one- and two-star end first, then look at how the shop answered the people it disappointed. A pattern holding across several months tells me more than a headline average built on volume. |
| Support experience | 10% | I open real tickets as a paying customer, clock the first reply from an actual person, and grade whether the answer solved the thing I asked about. One message per shop is deliberately inconvenient, because a support desk shows its real ceiling on the question the script does not cover. |
Tiers and Badge Colors
Four bands sit on top of the raw figure: 90 and above reads Excellent, 75 through 89 lands as Good, 60 through 74 is Fair, and anything below 60 gets filed as Poor.
What We Check
- After The Handover. Once a job is marked complete I go back into the account and look at what the visit left behind - live sessions in other cities, devices still authorised, login history, anything new sitting in the friend list. I swap the credentials myself and confirm the old session dies on the spot. A shop that prompts a customer to do this scores better than one that goes silent the moment delivery is confirmed.
- Bought With My Card. All 232 orders behind this site were paid for at the advertised price, with no press account, no comped run and no warning to the shop that a reviewer was watching. Each gets its own log: purchase timestamp, first contact, who played, queue length, screenshots at the close. Those logs stay on file, which is why I can answer a question about a job from four months back with a timestamp rather than a memory.
- Reading The Checkout. I walk the full purchase path on every shop and compare the total at the payment step against the quote one screen earlier. Currency switches, tips ticked in advance, priority add-ons that quietly become the default selection, service charges that only appear once an email address is entered - all of it gets noted. If those two totals differ by a dollar, the pricing column drops and the gap goes into the review.
- Refunds, Actually Filed. A written policy is easy to publish. At least once per shop I file a real claim on a real paid job - one that stalled, or one that landed a tier short - and I record how long the money took to return, what form it came back in, and how much argument stood in the way. Store credit handed over where cash was promised counts as a failure in this column.
- The Awkward Ticket. Somewhere inside each order I send one message a support desk would rather not receive: change the target halfway through, explain the ToS exposure in plain language, tell me what happens if the assigned player vanishes for two days. Reply speed matters, but the grade comes from whether a human actually read the question. Canned paragraphs answering something adjacent are worth nothing at 10%.
Who Does This Work
Jordan Pierce, Data Editor. A data analyst by trade, which is how the delivery-time tables on this site ended up being his: one row per job, every timing pulled from his own receipts and screenshots instead of from what a shop advertises. He keeps the raw logs and will hand them to anyone who wants to check a figure line by line. He paid for all 232 orders the ratings rest on, and he runs the monthly re-audit himself - the last pass closed July 2, 2026.
No Paid Placements
No shop pays for placement here, and none of them could if they tried. Every job in the logs came out of my own budget, at the same price you would pay. Three rules hold that line:
- Some links on this site earn a commission when a reader buys through them. That money never moves a row up the table and never touches any of the five inputs - scoring is finished from the order logs before anyone looks at which links pay anything.
- When a reader shows me I got something wrong, the fix goes on the page in the open, dated, with a line saying what changed. Nothing gets quietly reworded overnight and left to fade.
- Same treatment for everyone: identical weights, the same purchase path, the same inconvenient ticket, the same refund attempt. A shop I happen to like personally gets audited exactly like one I do not.
Found a Mistake?
I get things wrong. A price moves, a policy gets rewritten, a shop fixes the exact thing I criticised three weeks earlier. If you spot something off, flag it to hello@bestboosting.net - quote the line you think is wrong and paste in the page it sits on, and I have what I need. I check the claim against the order logs and the timestamped screenshots before a word on the page moves.